In many companies, sustainability functions are built on the assumption that “one person can handle it.” The role is often assigned to a single individual, sometimes alongside other responsibilities. This structure is common across organizations in Japan, regardless of size.

But will this assumption continue to hold true?

The real question is not about headcount. It is whether there is a structure in place that allows one person to sustainably manage the function. Even within a one-person setup, there is a critical difference between someone who is “running the work” and someone who is simply “carrying it.” That difference has a significant impact on outcomes.

In practice, many professionals express the same concern: “The workload keeps increasing, but it doesn’t feel like we’re making progress.” Being busy without a sense of forward movement is often not an individual issue, but a structural one.

The Issue Is Not People, but Structure

Sustainability work tends to concentrate on a small number of people. CDP responses, EcoVadis assessments, Scope 3 calculations, supplier surveys, internal and external reporting, and executive briefings—these are often handled by a single person.

When the following conditions overlap, progress quickly stalls:

• Information is siloed within the individual
• Weak connection to management decision-making
• No clear prioritization

In this situation, nothing moves unless the individual takes action, and decision-making is left to personal judgment. As a result, workloads expand and dependency on specific individuals increases.

No matter how much effort is invested, it becomes difficult to sustain operations. The issue is not a lack of people—it is the absence of a structure that allows the work to run.

Designing a One-Person Function That Works

Common responses to this challenge include improving skills or increasing headcount. However, unless the underlying structure changes, these measures only redistribute the burden—they do not solve the core issue.

What matters is the ability to separate the work from the individual. Instead of relying on personal ownership, the goal is to design a system that functions regardless of who is in charge. Three elements are essential:

Prioritization
Clarify what matters most for your organization—and what does not.

Process
Standardize how work is carried out to reduce variability and workload.

Data
Build data not only for disclosure, but in a way that supports decision-making.

When these elements are in place, operations become less dependent on individual effort and begin to function as a system.

From “Execution” to “Design”

Once the structure is in place, the organization changes in a fundamental way. Dependency on individuals is reduced, allowing continuity even when roles change. Handover becomes smoother, reproducibility improves, and decision-making becomes more efficient. Communication—both internal and external—also becomes more consistent.

At the core of this structure is the roadmap. A roadmap is not just a set of targets—it serves as a framework for deciding what to do and in what order. It enables organizations to integrate new external requirements without resorting to reactive, ad hoc responses.

Many companies have already made progress on “execution,” such as ESG disclosures and Scope 3 calculations. However, fewer have established the “design” needed to sustain these efforts over time.

Execution is about completing tasks.
Design is about enabling operations to function continuously.

This distinction defines the difference in long-term progress.

In sustainability management, headcount is not the determining factor. With the right structure, even a single person can move things forward. Without it, increasing the number of people does not eliminate the difficulty.

It is not that “one person cannot manage it.” It is that “without structure, it cannot be sustained.”

This perspective is the starting point for meaningful change.

Building a System That Sustains Itself

At Neuromagic, we support organizations from structuring their current state to designing prioritization, processes, and data—always with the goal of creating a system that can operate sustainably.

If you are looking to move beyond one-off responses and build a structure that works continuously, we would be happy to support you. Starting with a simple assessment of your current state is perfectly fine.

※For inquiries related to this article, please select “Other” in the inquiry form.